A stop is an invalidation level, not a prediction. Set it so you exit before liquidation risk matters.
No signals. No predictions.
A stop-loss is the price where your trade thesis is wrong. If you can't explain what breaks at that level, your stop is arbitrary. Liquidation is different: it's forced. Your plan should assume slippage and spikes, and still keep liquidation far away.
Rule: Your stop must sit at the price where your idea is wrong (structure breaks, level fails, bias flips).
Why: Without invalidation, every stop is arbitrary. Example: "If this low breaks, the long is invalid."
Rule: Put the stop past the invalidation level with a buffer.
Why: Stops at obvious levels get wicked. Stop a bit below support, not exactly at support.
Rule: If typical wicks on your timeframe can hit your stop, the stop is too tight or the setup is wrong for that timeframe.
Why: You'll get stopped on variance, not invalidation. Example: 0.3% stop on a 1h trade that routinely wicks 1%+.
Rule: With that stop, the trade must still have acceptable R:R.
Why: If the stop has to be huge, the trade may not be worth it. Example: Need 3% stop, but realistic upside is only 2%.
Rule: Choose size/leverage so liquidation is meaningfully beyond the stop (account for slippage and spikes).
Why: A stop that can't trigger before liquidation is not a plan. Example: Stop -2% but liquidation at -2.5% โ reduce leverage.
Example: $10,000 account, risking 1% ($100), stop is $2 away from entry โ Position size = $100 รท $2 = 50 units max.
If you want a larger position, you need either: (a) more risk tolerance, (b) tighter stop (but check if it's still below structure), or (c) a different trade with better entry.
Enter your entry, stop, and leverage. PulseTrader checks whether liquidation is far enough away, and whether the stop is tight for the timeframe's typical movement.
If you can't state what invalidates the trade,
you don't have a stop โ you have hope.